Skip to content

Texas Takes the Lead in Out-of-Network Arbitration with State-Level Solution

The issue of out-of-network arbitration has been a topic of debate for some time now, with healthcare providers and insurance companies clashing over the appropriate method of resolving billing disputes. In recent developments, the federal government has temporarily halted arbitration at the federal level, while the state of Texas is looking to offer an alternative solution.

The Biden Administration's decision to halt arbitration at the federal level comes after the Texas Medical Association (TMA) successfully challenged what it perceived as a tilt towards commercial health plans under federal government regulations. The decision is seen as a win for healthcare providers, who have long argued that they are at a disadvantage in arbitration proceedings against insurance companies. However, it is important to note that the halt is temporary, and the issue is far from resolved.

In Austin, Representative Tom Oliverson, the chair of the House Committee on Insurance, has introduced House Bill 1592, which offers an alternative solution. The bill would allow ERISA plans to opt into the state's arbitration system, created by Senate Bill 1264 in the 2019 Texas Legislature. This means that healthcare providers who are out of network with an insurance plan could still pursue arbitration through the state system.

While the bill has yet to become law, it offers hope to those who have been impacted by out-of-network arbitration disputes. If passed, it would give healthcare providers a more level playing field in disputes with insurance companies, as they would have access to a state-level arbitration system. This could potentially lead to fewer billing disputes and less stress for patients caught in the middle of these disputes.

Representative Oliverson, who is a practicing physician, has been a vocal advocate for healthcare providers and their patients. He has stated that the goal of the bill is to ensure that patients are not stuck with surprise medical bills and that providers are fairly compensated for their services. If successful, the bill could serve as a model for other states looking to address out-of-network arbitration.

In conclusion, the issue of out-of-network arbitration is a complex one, with no easy solutions. While the federal government has temporarily halted arbitration at the federal level, the introduction of HB 1592 in Texas offers hope for a more equitable solution. If passed, the bill could serve as a blueprint for other states looking to address this contentious issue.